1:4 fyco rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-abstractnouns נְאֻם־יְהוָֽה 1 If your language does not use an abstract noun for the idea behind the word **declaration**, you can express the same idea with a verbal form. Alternate translation: “Yahweh declares this to you.” (See: [[rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-abstractnouns]])
1:5 w86v rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-doublet אִם־גַּנָּבִ֤ים בָּאֽוּ־לְךָ֙ אִם־שׁ֣וֹדְדֵי לַ֔יְלָה 1 These two phrases mean the same thing. The repetition is used to emphasize the one idea that they are expressing. If this is not clear in your language, use another way of showing that this is important or you could combine them, as in the UST. (See: [[rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-doublet]])
1:5 b93f rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-activepassive אֵ֣יךְ נִדְמֵ֔יתָה 1 You could use the active form of the verb, and you could specify who is doing the action. Alternate translation: “how the attackers will destroy you” (See: [[rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-activepassive]])
1:5 jd9r rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-exclamations אֵ֣יךְ נִדְמֵ֔יתָה 1 Yahweh adds this phrase in the middle of another sentence to express that the punishment of Edom is shocking. Unlike thieves and grape-harvesters, those who attack Edom will leave nothing behind. If it would be helpful in your language, you could move the phrase to the end of the verse and make it its own sentence. Alternate translation: “But attackers will destroy you completely” (See: [[rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-exclamations]])
1:5 q1pg rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-rquestion הֲל֥וֹא יִגְנְב֖וּ דַּיָּ֑ם 1 This is a rhetorical question. The question form is used to make a point strongly. If you do not use rhetorical questions in this way in your language, you could use a statement here. Alternate translation: “they would only steal what they wanted” (See: [[rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-rquestion]])
1:5 k12c rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-rquestion אִם־בֹּֽצְרִים֙ בָּ֣אוּ לָ֔ךְ הֲל֖וֹא יַשְׁאִ֥ירוּ עֹלֵלֽוֹת 1 This is a rhetorical question. The question form is used to make a point strongly. If you do not use rhetorical questions in this way in your language, you could use a statement here. Alternate translation: “they would certainly leave some grapes behind” (See: [[rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-rquestion]])
1:6 gpm5 rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-exclamations אֵ֚יךְ 1 Here, **How** introduces an exclamation to express amazement that the pillaging of Edom is so extreme. Use a natural way in your language to express this. Alternate translation: “In an extreme way” or “Completely” (See: [[rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-exclamations]])
1:6 zsf7 rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-activepassive אֵ֚יךְ נֶחְפְּשׂ֣וּ עֵשָׂ֔ו 1 If it would be helpful in your language, you could use the active form of this verb, and you could say who is doing the action. Alternate translation: “How the attackers will ransack the country of Edom” (See: [[rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-activepassive]])
1:6 m9p3 rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-personification עֵשָׂ֔ו 1 Here, the name **Esau** refers to the people of Edom. They were the descendants of Esau, who was also known as Edom. All the people of Edom are being portrayed as if they were a single person, their ancestor. If this is confusing in your language, you can refer to the people instead, as in the UST. (See: [[rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-personification]])
1:6 lf9t נֶחְפְּשׂ֣וּ 1 Here, **ransacked** means that the enemies have searched through the people’s things, taken everything valuable, and left everything else in a mess or damaged.
1:6 w96y rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-activepassive נִבְע֖וּ מַצְפֻּנָֽיו 1 If it would be helpful in your language, you could use the active form of this verb, and you could say who is doing the action. Alternate translation: “They will search out all of his hidden treasures” (See: [[rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-activepassive]])
1:7 yobe rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-explicit עַֽד־הַגְּב֣וּל שִׁלְּח֗וּךָ כֹּ֚ל אַנְשֵׁ֣י בְרִיתֶ֔ךָ 1 If it does not make sense in your language to say that someone would be attacked by someone with whom they have a **covenant**, that is, an ally, then you could add in the missing step of their betrayal, as in the UST. (See: [[rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-explicit]])
1:7 n3t6 rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-youcrowd בְרִיתֶ֔ךָ 1 Yahweh is still addressing the people of Edom here, so the word **your** refers to them. (See: [[rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-youcrowd]])
1:7 cr88 עַֽד־הַגְּב֣וּל שִׁלְּח֗וּךָ 1 Here, **the border** could mean: (1) It could refer to the border of the country of Edom. Alternate translation: “will force you out of your country” or (2) it could refer to the border of a formerly friendly country. Alternate translation: “will reject you from taking refuge in their country”
1:7 a612 rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-parallelism כֹּ֚ל אַנְשֵׁ֣י בְרִיתֶ֔ךָ & אַנְשֵׁ֣י שְׁלֹמֶ֑ךָ לַחְמְךָ֗ 1 All three phrases refer to Edom’s allies. Yahweh is showing that what he is saying is important by saying it more than once in similar ways. (See: [[rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-parallelism]])
1:7 jd15 rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-ellipsis לַחְמְךָ֗ יָשִׂ֤ימוּ מָזוֹר֙ תַּחְתֶּ֔יךָ 1 Hebrew says simply **your bread**. In this poetic style, hearers and readers are expected to understand the meaning and supply the missing words **The men of** from the previous two lines. (See: [[rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-ellipsis]])
1:7 rc1i rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-aside אֵ֥ין תְּבוּנָ֖ה בּֽוֹ 1 This phrase could mean: (1) Yahweh could be saying this as an aside in order to express his evaluation of the people of Edom. If this would be confusing in your language, you could continue the address to Edom in the second person, as in the UST. (2) the former allies could be saying this about Edom. Alternate translation: “Then they will say to you, ‘you are not as clever as you thought you were’” (3) It could be referring to the trap just mentioned. Alternate translation: “and there is no perception of it” (4) It could be referring to the shocking situation of Edom being betrayed by its allies. Alternate translation: “There is no understanding of this” (See: [[rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-aside]])
1:7 jd17 rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-abstractnouns אֵ֥ין תְּבוּנָ֖ה בּֽוֹ 1 If your language does not use an abstract noun for the idea behind the word **understanding**, you can express the same idea with a verbal form. Alternate translation: “He does not understand anything” (See: [[rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-abstractnouns]])
1:7 jd19 rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-personification בּֽוֹ 1 Here, **him** probably refers to Edom, which represents the people who live there. Alternate translation: “in the people of Edom” (See: [[rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-personification]])
1:8 i4rg rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-rquestion הֲל֛וֹא בַּיּ֥וֹם הַה֖וּא & וְהַאֲבַדְתִּ֤י חֲכָמִים֙ מֵֽאֱד֔וֹם 1 This is a rhetorical question. Yahweh uses the question form here to emphasize that he will certainly do this. Alternate translation: “On that day … I will certainly destroy the wise men from Edom” (See: [[rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-rquestion]])
1:8 jd21 rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-explicit וְהַאֲבַדְתִּ֤י חֲכָמִים֙ מֵֽאֱד֔וֹם 1 The original audience would have known that Edom was famous for its wisdom. So this means that even their famous wisdom cannot save them from Yahweh’s destruction. If it would be helpful in your language, you could indicate this information as in the UST. (See: [[rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-explicit]])
1:8 i6ry rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-rquestion וּתְבוּנָ֖ה מֵהַ֥ר עֵשָֽׂו 1 This is the second part of the rhetorical question. You could also start a new sentence here. Yahweh continues the question form here to emphasize that he will certainly do this. Alternate translation: “and I will certainly destroy their understanding” or “On that day I will certainly remove understanding from the mountain of Esau” (See: [[rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-rquestion]])
1:8 mupa rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-explicit וּתְבוּנָ֖ה מֵהַ֥ר עֵשָֽׂו 1 In this poetic style, the reader is expected to use the words **will I not on that day destroy** from the first rhetorical question in order to understand this second one. If that is not clear in your language, you could repeat those words here. Alternate translation: “and will I not on that day destroy understanding from the mountain of Esau?” (See: [[rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-explicit]])
1:8 g6se rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-parallelism חֲכָמִים֙ מֵֽאֱד֔וֹם וּתְבוּנָ֖ה מֵהַ֥ר עֵשָֽׂו 1 In this poetic style, the same meaning is expressed twice but in different words in order to emphasize what is being said. Here, **wise men** and **understanding** both refer to people who are wise, and **Edom** and **the mountain of Esau** are both ways of referring to the country of Edom. If this is confusing in your language, you can say this only once, or emphasize the meaning in another way. Alternate translation: “all people who are wise from the country of Edom” (See: [[rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-parallelism]])
1:8 jd23 rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-abstractnouns וּתְבוּנָ֖ה 1 If your language does not use an abstract noun for the idea behind the word **understanding**, you can express the same idea with a verbal form. Alternate translation: “and people who know what to do” (See: [[rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-abstractnouns]])
1:8 z8tf rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-synecdoche מֵהַ֥ר עֵשָֽׂו 1 Yahweh is referring to the whole territory of Edom by using the name of one prominent part of it. The **mountain of Esau** may be the one now called Mount Bozrah. Alternate translation: “from the land of Edom” (See: [[rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-synecdoche]])
If your language does not use an abstract noun for the idea behind the word **declaration**, you can express the same idea with a verbal form. Alternate translation: “Yahweh declares this to you.” (See: [[rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-abstractnouns]])ଯଦି ଆପଣଙ୍କର ଭାଷା **ଘୋଷଣା** ଶବ୍ଦ ପଛରେ ଥିବା ଧାରଣା ପାଇଁ ଏକ ଗୁଣବାଚକ ବିଶେଷ୍ୟ ବ୍ୟବହାର କରେ ନାହିଁ, ତେବେ ଆପଣ ସମାନ ଧାରଣାକୁ ଏକ ମୁଖଗତ ବାକ୍ୟରେ ପ୍ରକାଶ କରିପାରିbe । ବିକଳ୍ପ ଅନୁବାଦ: “ସଦାପ୍ରଭୁ ତୁମ୍ଭମାନଙ୍କ ନିମନ୍ତେ ଏହା ଏହା ଘୋଷଣା କରନ୍ତି।”
These two phrases mean the same thing. The repetition is used to emphasize the one idea that they are expressing. If this is not clear in your language, use another way of showing that this is important or you could combine them, as in the UST. (See: [[rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-doublet]])ଏହି ଦୁଇଟି ବାକ୍ୟାଂଶ ସମାନ ଅର୍ଥକୁ ପ୍ରକାଶ କରେ । ପୁନରାବୃତ୍ତିକୁ ବ୍ୟବହାର କରି ସେମାନେ ପ୍ରକାଶ କରୁଥିବା ଧାରଣାକୁ ଗୁରୁତ୍ୱ ଦିଆଯାଇ ଅଛି । ଯଦି ଏହା ଆପଣଙ୍କ ଭାଷାରେ ସ୍ପଷ୍ଟ ନୁହେଁ, ତେବେ ଏହା ଗୁରୁତ୍ୱପୂର୍ଣ୍ଣ ବୋଲି ଦର୍ଶାଇବାକୁ ଅନ୍ୟ ଏକ ଉପାୟ ବ୍ୟବହାର କରନ୍ତୁ କିମ୍ବା UST ପରି ଆପଣ ସେଗୁଡିକୁ ଏକତ୍ର ପ୍ରକାଶ କରି ପାରିବେ ।
38
1:5
b93f
rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-activepassive
אֵ֣יךְ נִדְמֵ֔יתָה
1
You could use the active form of the verb, and you could specify who is doing the action. Alternate translation: “how the attackers will destroy you” (See: [[rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-activepassive]])ଆପଣ କ୍ରିୟାର କର୍ମବାଚ୍ୟ ବ୍ୟବହାର କରିପାରିବେ, ଏବଂ କିଏ କାର୍ଯ୍ୟ କରେ ତାହା ନିର୍ଦ୍ଦିଷ୍ଟ କରିପାରିବେ । ବିକଳ୍ପ ଅନୁବାଦ: “ଆକ୍ରମଣକାରୀମାନେ କିପରି ତୁମ୍ଭମାନଙ୍କୁ ବିନାଶ କରିବେ”
39
1:5
jd9r
rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-exclamations
אֵ֣יךְ נִדְמֵ֔יתָה
1
Yahweh adds this phrase in the middle of another sentence to express that the punishment of Edom is shocking. Unlike thieves and grape-harvesters, those who attack Edom will leave nothing behind. If it would be helpful in your language, you could move the phrase to the end of the verse and make it its own sentence. Alternate translation: “But attackers will destroy you completely” (See: [[rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-exclamations]])ସଦାପ୍ରଭୁ ଅନ୍ୟ ବାକ୍ୟର ମଧ୍ୟ ଭାଗରେ ଏହି ବାକ୍ୟାଂଶ ଯୋଡି ଇଦୋମର ଦଣ୍ଡ ଆଶ୍ଚର୍ଯ୍ୟଜନକ ଅଟେ ବୋଲି ପ୍ରକାଶ କରନ୍ତି । ଚୋର ଏବଂ ଦ୍ରାକ୍ଷାଫଳ ସଞ୍ଚୟକାରୀ-ମାନେ ପରି, ଯେଉଁମାନେ ଇଦୋମ ଉପରେ ଆକ୍ରମଣ କରନ୍ତି ସେମାନେ ସମସ୍ତ ବିଷୟକୁ ନାଶ କରିବେ । ଯଦି ଏହା ଆପଣଙ୍କ ଭାଷାରେ ସହାୟକ ହେବ, ତେବେ ଆପଣ ବାକ୍ୟାଂଶକୁ ପଦର ଶେଷରେ ଉଲ୍ଲେଖ କରି ପାରିବେ ଏବଂ ଏହାକୁ ନିଜସ୍ୱ ବାକ୍ୟରେ ପରିଣତ କରିପାରିବେ । ବିକଳ୍ପ ଅନୁବାଦ: “କିନ୍ତୁ ଆକ୍ରମଣକାରୀମାନେ ତୁମ୍ଭକୁ ସଂପୂର୍ଣ୍ଣ ଧ୍ୱଂସ କରିବେ”
40
1:5
q1pg
rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-rquestion
הֲל֥וֹא יִגְנְב֖וּ דַּיָּ֑ם
1
This is a rhetorical question. The question form is used to make a point strongly. If you do not use rhetorical questions in this way in your language, you could use a statement here. Alternate translation: “they would only steal what they wanted” (See: [[rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-rquestion]])ଏହା ଏକ ଆଳଙ୍କାରିକ ପ୍ରଶ୍ନ ଅଟେ। ଏହି ପ୍ରଶ୍ନକୁ ବ୍ୟବହାର କରି ଏକ ଦୃଢ଼ ବିଷୟକୁ ପ୍ରକାଶ କରାଯାଇ ଅଛି । ଯଦି ଆପଣ ଆପଣଙ୍କର ଭାଷାରେ ଏହିପରି ପ୍ରଶ୍ନଗୁଡିକ ବ୍ୟବହାର କରନ୍ତି ନାହିଁ, ଆପଣ ଏଠାରେ ଏକ ବାକ୍ୟ ବ୍ୟବହାର କରିପାରିବେ । ବିକଳ୍ପ ଅନୁବାଦ: “ସେମାନେ ଯାହା ଚାହାଁନ୍ତି ତାହା ଚୋରି କରିବେ”
This is a rhetorical question. The question form is used to make a point strongly. If you do not use rhetorical questions in this way in your language, you could use a statement here. Alternate translation: “they would certainly leave some grapes behind” (See: [[rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-rquestion]])ଏହା ଏକ ଆଳଙ୍କାରିକ ପ୍ରଶ୍ନ ଅଟେ। ଏହି ପ୍ରଶ୍ନକୁ ବ୍ୟବହାର କରି ଏକ ଦୃଢ଼ ବିଷୟକୁ ପ୍ରକାଶ କରାଯାଇ ଅଛି । ଯଦି ଆପଣ ଆପଣଙ୍କର ଭାଷାରେ ଏହିପରି ପ୍ରଶ୍ନଗୁଡିକ ବ୍ୟବହାର କରନ୍ତି ନାହିଁ, ଆପଣ ଏଠାରେ ଏକ ବାକ୍ୟ ବ୍ୟବହାର କରିପାରିବେ । ବିକଳ୍ପ ଅନୁବାଦ: “ସେମାନେ ନିଶ୍ଚିତ ଅଳ୍ପମାତ୍ର ଦ୍ରାକ୍ଷାଫଳ ଛାଡ଼ିବେ”
42
1:6
gpm5
rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-exclamations
אֵ֚יךְ
1
Here, **How** introduces an exclamation to express amazement that the pillaging of Edom is so extreme. Use a natural way in your language to express this. Alternate translation: “In an extreme way” or “Completely” (See: [[rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-exclamations]])ଏଠାରେ, **କିପରି** ଶବ୍ଦ ଇଦୋମର ଲୁଟ୍ପାଟ୍ ଏତେ ଚରମ ବୋଲି ଆଶ୍ଚର୍ଯ୍ୟ ପ୍ରକଟ କରିବା ପାଇଁ ଏକ ବିସ୍ମୟ ସୂଚକ ଅବ୍ୟୟ ଅଟେ । ଏହାକୁ ପ୍ରକାଶ କରିବାକୁ ଆପଣଙ୍କ ଭାଷାରେ ଏକ ସ୍ୱାଭାବିକ ଉପାୟ ବ୍ୟବହାର କରନ୍ତୁ । ବିକଳ୍ପ ଅନୁବାଦ: “ଏକ ଅତ୍ୟନ୍ତ ଉପାୟରେ” କିମ୍ବା “ସଂପୂର୍ଣ୍ଣ ଭାବରେ”
43
1:6
zsf7
rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-activepassive
אֵ֚יךְ נֶחְפְּשׂ֣וּ עֵשָׂ֔ו
1
If it would be helpful in your language, you could use the active form of this verb, and you could say who is doing the action. Alternate translation: “How the attackers will ransack the country of Edom” (See: [[rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-activepassive]])ଯଦି ଏହା ଆପଣଙ୍କ ଭାଷାରେ ସହାୟକ ହେବ, ଆପଣ ଏହି କ୍ରିୟାର କର୍ତ୍ତୁବାଚ୍ୟ ବ୍ୟବହାର କରିପାରିବେ, ଏବଂ କାର୍ଯ୍ୟ କାର୍ଯ୍ୟ କିଏ କରେ ତାହା ଆପଣ ପ୍ରକାଶ କରି ପାରିବେ । ବିକଳ୍ପ ଅନୁବାଦ: “ଆକ୍ରମଣକାରୀମାନେ କିପରି ଇଦୋମ ଦେଶକୁ ଲୁଣ୍ଠନ କରିବେ”
44
1:6
m9p3
rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-personification
עֵשָׂ֔ו
1
Here, the name **Esau** refers to the people of Edom. They were the descendants of Esau, who was also known as Edom. All the people of Edom are being portrayed as if they were a single person, their ancestor. If this is confusing in your language, you can refer to the people instead, as in the UST. (See: [[rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-personification]])ଏଠାରେ, **ଏଷୌ** ନାମ ଇଦୋମର ଲୋକମାନଙ୍କୁ ବୁଝାଏ । ସେମାନେ ଏଷୌର ବଂଶଧର ଥିଲେ। ଇଦୋମର ସମସ୍ତ ଲୋକମାନଙ୍କୁ ଏପରି ଚିତ୍ରିତ କରାଯାଉଛି ଯେପରି ସେମାନେ ଏକ ବ୍ୟକ୍ତି ଅଟନ୍ତି ଯିଏ ସେମାନଙ୍କର ପୂର୍ବଜ ଅଟନ୍ତି । ଯଦି ଏହା ଆପଣଙ୍କ ଭାଷାରେ ଅସ୍ପଷ୍ଟ ହୁଏ, ଆପଣ UST ପରି ଏହା ବଦଳରେ ଲୋକଙ୍କୁ ସୂଚାଇ କରିପାରିବେ ।
45
1:6
lf9t
נֶחְפְּשׂ֣וּ
1
Here, **ransacked** means that the enemies have searched through the people’s things, taken everything valuable, and left everything else in a mess or damaged.ଏଠାରେ, **ଲୁଣ୍ଠନ କରିବା** ବାକ୍ୟର ଅର୍ଥ ଶତ୍ରୁମାନେ ଲୋକମାନଙ୍କର ସମସ୍ତ ବିଷୟକୁ ଅନ୍ୱେଷଣ କରିଛନ୍ତି, ସମସ୍ତ ମୂଲ୍ୟବାନ ବସ୍ତୁ ନେଇଛନ୍ତି, ଏବଂ ଅନ୍ୟ ସମସ୍ତ ଜିନିଷକୁ ନଷ୍ଟ କରିଛନ୍ତି ।
46
1:6
w96y
rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-activepassive
נִבְע֖וּ מַצְפֻּנָֽיו
1
If it would be helpful in your language, you could use the active form of this verb, and you could say who is doing the action. Alternate translation: “They will search out all of his hidden treasures” (See: [[rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-activepassive]])ଯଦି ଏହା ଆପଣଙ୍କ ଭାଷାରେ ସହାୟକ ହେବ, ତେବେ ଆପଣ ଏହି କ୍ରିୟାର କର୍ତ୍ତୁବାଚ୍ୟ ବ୍ୟବହାର କରିପାରିବେ, ଏବଂ କାର୍ଯ୍ୟ କିଏ କରେ ତାହା ଆପଣ ପ୍ରକାଶ କରି ପାରିବେ । ବିକଳ୍ପ ଅନୁବାଦ: “ସେମାନେ ତାଙ୍କର ସମସ୍ତ ଲୁକ୍କାୟିତ ଧନ ଅନ୍ୱେଷଣ କରିବେ”
If it does not make sense in your language to say that someone would be attacked by someone with whom they have a **covenant**, that is, an ally, then you could add in the missing step of their betrayal, as in the UST. (See: [[rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-explicit]])ଯଦି ଆପଣଙ୍କର ଭାଷାରେ ଏହା ଜଣେ ବ୍ୟକ୍ତି **ମିତ୍ର** କିମ୍ବା ଚୁକ୍ତି ସ୍ଥାପନ କରିଥିବା ବ୍ୟକ୍ତିକୁ ଆକ୍ରମଣ କିମ୍ବା ବିଶ୍ୱାସଘାତକତା କରିବାକୁ ବୁଝାଏ ନାହିଁ ତେବେ ଆପଣ UST ଭଳି ଏହାକୁ ପ୍ରକାଶ କରି ପାରିବେ ।
48
1:7
n3t6
rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-youcrowd
בְרִיתֶ֔ךָ
1
Yahweh is still addressing the people of Edom here, so the word **your** refers to them. (See: [[rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-youcrowd]])ସଦାପ୍ରଭୁ ଏପର୍ଯ୍ୟନ୍ତ ଇଦୋମର ଲୋକମାନଙ୍କୁ ସମ୍ବୋଧିତ କରୁଛନ୍ତି, ତେଣୁ **ତୁମ୍ଭର** ଶବ୍ଦ ସେମାନଙ୍କୁ ବୁଝାଏ ।
49
1:7
cr88
עַֽד־הַגְּב֣וּל שִׁלְּח֗וּךָ
1
Here, **the border** could mean: (1) It could refer to the border of the country of Edom. Alternate translation: “will force you out of your country” or (2) it could refer to the border of a formerly friendly country. Alternate translation: “will reject you from taking refuge in their country”ଏଠାରେ, **ସୀମା** ଅର୍ଥ ବୁଯାଇପାରେ: (1) ଏହା ଇଦୋମ ଦେଶର ସୀମାକୁ ସୂଚାଇପାରେ । ବିକଳ୍ପ ଅନୁବାଦ: “ତୁମ୍ଭକୁ ତୁମ୍ଭ ଦେଶରୁ ବାହାରି ଯିବାକୁ ବାଧ୍ୟ କରିବ” କିମ୍ବା (2) ଏହା ଏକ ପୂର୍ବ ବନ୍ଧୁତ୍ୱପୂର୍ଣ୍ଣ ଦେଶର ସୀମାକୁ ସୂଚାଇପାରେ । ବିକଳ୍ପ ଅନୁବାଦ: “ଆପଣା ଦେଶରେ ଆଶ୍ରୟ ନେବାକୁ ତୁମ୍ଭକୁ ପ୍ରତ୍ୟାଖ୍ୟାନ କରିବ”
All three phrases refer to Edom’s allies. Yahweh is showing that what he is saying is important by saying it more than once in similar ways. (See: [[rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-parallelism]])ଏହି ତିନୋଟି ବାକ୍ୟାଂଶ ଇଦୋମର ସହଯୋଗୀମାନଙ୍କୁ ବୁଝାଏ । ସଦାପ୍ରଭୁ ଏକାଧିକ ଥର ଏହି ବାକ୍ୟାଂଶକୁ କହି ଏହାର ଗୁରୁତ୍ୱପୂର୍ଣ୍ଣକୁ ପ୍ରକାଶ କରନ୍ତି ।
51
1:7
jd15
rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-ellipsis
לַחְמְךָ֗ יָשִׂ֤ימוּ מָזוֹר֙ תַּחְתֶּ֔יךָ
1
Hebrew says simply **your bread**. In this poetic style, hearers and readers are expected to understand the meaning and supply the missing words **The men of** from the previous two lines. (See: [[rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-ellipsis]])ଏବ୍ରୀ ସାଧାରଣତଃ **ତୁମ୍ଭର ଅନ୍ନ** କୁହନ୍ତି । ଏହି କାବ୍ୟଛନ୍ଦରେ ଶ୍ରୋତା ଏବଂ ପାଠକମାନେ ଏହାର ଅର୍ଥ ବୁଝି ପାରିବେ ଏବଂ ଉଲ୍ଲେଖ ନ ଥିବା ଶବ୍ଦଗୁଡିକୁ ପୂର୍ବ ଦୁଇ ବାକ୍ୟାଂଶରେ ଉଲ୍ଲେଖ ଥିବା **ମନୁଷ୍ୟମାନେ** କେଉଁଠାରୁ ଆସଥିଲେ ଜାଣି ପାରିବେ ।
52
1:7
rc1i
rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-aside
אֵ֥ין תְּבוּנָ֖ה בּֽוֹ
1
This phrase could mean: (1) Yahweh could be saying this as an aside in order to express his evaluation of the people of Edom. If this would be confusing in your language, you could continue the address to Edom in the second person, as in the UST. (2) the former allies could be saying this about Edom. Alternate translation: “Then they will say to you, ‘you are not as clever as you thought you were’” (3) It could be referring to the trap just mentioned. Alternate translation: “and there is no perception of it” (4) It could be referring to the shocking situation of Edom being betrayed by its allies. Alternate translation: “There is no understanding of this” (See: [[rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-aside]])ଏହି ବାକ୍ୟର ଅର୍ଥ ହୋଇପାରେ: (1) ଇଦୋମର ଲୋକମାନଙ୍କ ପ୍ରତି ସଦାପ୍ରଭୁ ଆପଣା ମୂଲ୍ୟାଙ୍କନ ପ୍ରକାଶ କରିବା ପାଇଁ ଏହାକୁ ଏକ ପୃଥକ ଭାବରେ ବ୍ୟବହାର କରିଥାଇ ପାରନ୍ତି । ଯଦି ଏହା ଆପଣଙ୍କ ଭାଷାରେ ସ୍ପଷ୍ଟ ନ ହୁଏ, ଆପଣ UST ପରି ଦ୍ୱିତୀୟ ପୁରୁଷରେ ଇଦୋମକୁ ସୂଚାଇ ପାରିବେ । (2) ପୂର୍ବ ସହଯୋଗୀମାନେ ଇଦୋମ ବିଷୟରେ ଏହା କହିପାରନ୍ତି । ବିକଳ୍ପ ଅନୁବାଦ: “ତା’ପରେ ସେମାନେ ତୁମ୍ଭକୁ କହିବେ,‘ ତୁମ୍ଭେ ସେତିକି ଚତୁର ନୁହଁ ଯେତିକି ତୁମ୍ଭେ ଭାବିଥିଲ ’’ (3) ଏହା କେବଳ ଉଲ୍ଲେଖ କରାଯାଇଥିବା ଫାନ୍ଦ ବିଷୟରେ ସୂଚାଇପାରେ । ବିକଳ୍ପ ଅନୁବାଦ: “ଏବଂ ଏହାର କୌଣସି ଅନୁଭୂତି ନାହିଁ” (4) ଏହା ଇଦୋମର ସହଯୋଗୀମାନଙ୍କ ଦ୍ୱାରା ବିଶ୍ୱାସଘାତକତା ହେବାର ଆଶ୍ଚର୍ଯ୍ୟଜନକ ପରିସ୍ଥିତିକୁ ସୂଚାଇପାରେ । ବିକଳ୍ପ ଅନୁବାଦ: “ଏହାର କୌଣସି ଧାରଣା ନାହିଁ”
53
1:7
jd17
rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-abstractnouns
אֵ֥ין תְּבוּנָ֖ה בּֽוֹ
1
If your language does not use an abstract noun for the idea behind the word **understanding**, you can express the same idea with a verbal form. Alternate translation: “He does not understand anything” (See: [[rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-abstractnouns]])ଯଦି ଆପଣଙ୍କର ଭାଷା **ବୁଦ୍ଧି** ଶବ୍ଦ ପଛରେ ଥିବା ଧାରଣା ପାଇଁ ଏକ ଗୁଣବାଚକ ବିଶେଷ୍ୟ ବ୍ୟବହାର କରେ ନାହିଁ, ତେବେ ଆପଣ ସମାନ ଧାରଣାକୁ ଏକ ମୌଖିକ ବାକ୍ୟରେ ପ୍ରକାଶ କରିପାରିବେ । ବିକଳ୍ପ ଅନୁବାଦ: “ସେ କିଛି ବୁଝେ ନାହିଁ”
54
1:7
jd19
rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-personification
בּֽוֹ
1
Here, **him** probably refers to Edom, which represents the people who live there. Alternate translation: “in the people of Edom” (See: [[rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-personification]])ଏଠାରେ, **ତାହାର** ବୋଧହୁଏ ଇଦୋମକୁ ବୁଝାଏ, ଯାହା ସେଠାରେ ରହୁଥିବା ଲୋକମାନଙ୍କୁ ବୁଝାଏ । ବିକଳ୍ପ ଅନୁବାଦ: “ଇଦୋମର ଲୋକମାନଙ୍କ ମଧ୍ୟରେ”
This is a rhetorical question. Yahweh uses the question form here to emphasize that he will certainly do this. Alternate translation: “On that day … I will certainly destroy the wise men from Edom” (See: [[rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-rquestion]])ଏହା ଏକ ଆଳଙ୍କାରିକ ପ୍ରଶ୍ନ ଅଟେ। ସଦାପ୍ରଭୁ ନିଶ୍ଚିତ ଭାବରେ ଏହା କରିବେ ବୋଲି ଜୋର ଦେବା ପାଇଁ ଏଠାରେ ଏହି ପ୍ରଶ୍ନ ବ୍ୟବହାର କରନ୍ତି । ବିକଳ୍ପ ଅନୁବାଦ: “ସେହିଦିନ… ମୁଁ ନିଶ୍ଚିତ ଭାବରେ ଇଦୋମରୁ ଜ୍ଞାନୀମାନଙ୍କୁ ବିନାଶ କରିବି”
56
1:8
jd21
rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-explicit
וְהַאֲבַדְתִּ֤י חֲכָמִים֙ מֵֽאֱד֔וֹם
1
The original audience would have known that Edom was famous for its wisdom. So this means that even their famous wisdom cannot save them from Yahweh’s destruction. If it would be helpful in your language, you could indicate this information as in the UST. (See: [[rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-explicit]])ସମ୍ଭବତଃ ମୂଳ ପାଠକ ଜାଣିଥିଲେ ଯେ ଇଦୋମ ଏହାର ଜ୍ଞାନ ପାଇଁ ପ୍ରସିଦ୍ଧ ଥିଲା । ତେଣୁ ଏହାର ଅର୍ଥ ସେମାନଙ୍କର ପ୍ରସିଦ୍ଧ ଜ୍ଞାନ ମଧ୍ୟ ସେମାନଙ୍କୁ ସଦାପ୍ରଭୁଙ୍କ ବିନାଶରୁ ରକ୍ଷା କରିପାରିବ ନାହିଁ । ଯଦି ଏହା ଆପଣଙ୍କ ଭାଷାରେ ସହାୟକ ହେବ, ଆପଣ UST ପରି ଏହି ସୂଚନା ସୂଚାଇ ପାରିବେ ।
57
1:8
i6ry
rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-rquestion
וּתְבוּנָ֖ה מֵהַ֥ר עֵשָֽׂו
1
This is the second part of the rhetorical question. You could also start a new sentence here. Yahweh continues the question form here to emphasize that he will certainly do this. Alternate translation: “and I will certainly destroy their understanding” or “On that day I will certainly remove understanding from the mountain of Esau” (See: [[rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-rquestion]])ଏହା ଆଳଙ୍କାରିକା ପ୍ରଶ୍ନର ଦ୍ୱିତୀୟ ଭାଗ ଅଟେ । ଆପଣ ଏଠାରେ ଏକ ନୂତନ ବାକ୍ୟ ମଧ୍ୟ ଆରମ୍ଭ କରିପାରିବେ । ସେ ନିଶ୍ଚିତ ଭାବରେ ଏହା କରିବେ ବୋଲି ଜୋର ଦେବା ପାଇଁ ଏଠାରେ ପ୍ରଶ୍ନବାଚ୍ୟ ବ୍ୟବହାର କରନ୍ତି । ବିକଳ୍ପ ଅନୁବାଦ: “ଏବଂ ମୁଁ ନିଶ୍ଚିତ ଭାବରେ ସେମାନଙ୍କର ବୁଦ୍ଧି ନଷ୍ଟ କରିଦେବି” କିମ୍ବା “ସେହି ଦିନ ମୁଁ ନିଶ୍ଚିତ ଭାବରେ ଏଷୌର ପର୍ବତରୁ ବୁଦ୍ଧି ଅପସାରଣ କରିବି”
58
1:8
mupa
rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-explicit
וּתְבוּנָ֖ה מֵהַ֥ר עֵשָֽׂו
1
In this poetic style, the reader is expected to use the words **will I not on that day destroy** from the first rhetorical question in order to understand this second one. If that is not clear in your language, you could repeat those words here. Alternate translation: “and will I not on that day destroy understanding from the mountain of Esau?” (See: [[rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-explicit]])
In this poetic style, the same meaning is expressed twice but in different words in order to emphasize what is being said. Here, **wise men** and **understanding** both refer to people who are wise, and **Edom** and **the mountain of Esau** are both ways of referring to the country of Edom. If this is confusing in your language, you can say this only once, or emphasize the meaning in another way. Alternate translation: “all people who are wise from the country of Edom” (See: [[rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-parallelism]])
60
1:8
jd23
rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-abstractnouns
וּתְבוּנָ֖ה
1
If your language does not use an abstract noun for the idea behind the word **understanding**, you can express the same idea with a verbal form. Alternate translation: “and people who know what to do” (See: [[rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-abstractnouns]])
61
1:8
z8tf
rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-synecdoche
מֵהַ֥ר עֵשָֽׂו
1
Yahweh is referring to the whole territory of Edom by using the name of one prominent part of it. The **mountain of Esau** may be the one now called Mount Bozrah. Alternate translation: “from the land of Edom” (See: [[rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-synecdoche]])
See in Reader
Gayatri-Digal