MAT 20:16 Reword footnote #798
Labels
No Label
After June_2023 merge
Audio Waiting
Drew
Henry
Info - different
Info - missing
Info added
John
Needs TN
No Audio Yet
Not Urgent
Rendering
Susan
Tom
unreadable
No Milestone
No Assignees
2 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: WycliffeAssociates/en_ulb#798
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s(<nil>)"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
I have include the original note from Henry below.
Current: The best ancient copies do not have
Suggested: Some ancient copies do not have
This phrase is included in the OGNT so I think it should be kept in the ULB.
Matt 20:16:
\f + \ft The best ancient copies do not have \fqa Many are called, but few are chosen \fqa* . \f*
These words are not in the ULB either. The note needs to be either rephrased, e.g.,
\f + \ft Some ancient copies add here \fqa Many are called, but few are chosen. \fqa* \f*
or deleted.
Current ULB:
\v 16 So the last will be first, and the first last." \f + \ft The best ancient copies do not have \fqa Many are called, but few are chosen \fqa* . \f*
@drewcurley, I don't see "Many are called by few are chosen" in the OGNT.
We have 19 footnotes with "The best ancient copies do not have ..." These footnotes were used when some translations have material that the ULB doesn't have because the best ancient copies do not have them.
You are right, the OGNT does not have this phrase. I swear that I saw it, but I must have been seeing things. I have triple checked.
So shall we leave the ULB as is?
As long as it has the note: Some ancient copies add here: Many are called, but few are chosen
It has
\v 16 So the last will be first, and the first last." \f + \ft The best ancient copies do not have \fqa Many are called, but few are chosen \fqa* . \f*