1 Tim 767c4045
From work on PDF 1 Timothy 01/08/2019 01:32 PM #136
Labels
No Label
After June_2023 merge
Audio Waiting
Drew
Henry
Info - different
Info - missing
Info added
John
Needs TN
No Audio Yet
Not Urgent
Rendering
Susan
Tom
unreadable
No Milestone
No Assignees
3 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: WycliffeAssociates/en_ulb#136
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s(<nil>)"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
SQ See issue 124 for "solemnly charge"
6:17
Here is "solemnly charge" again. I assume we will have dealt with this issue before anyone gets to this commit.
SQ
I address this verse in issue 134.
1 Tim 6:20
-\v 20 Timothy, protect what was given to you. Avoid the foolish talk and conflicting ideas of what is falsely called knowledge.
+\v 20 Timothy, protect what was given to you. Avoid the empty, profane talk and conflicting ideas of what is falsely called knowledge.
\v 20 Timothy, protect what was given to you. Avoid the profane and empty talk and the conflicting ideas of what is falsely called knowledge.
I think "profane" is a more difficult word, but it has a tw page. I would be open to using one of the other words on the tw page, such as "godless" or "unholy."
"Profane" is also in 4:7
SQ
Some form of "profane" occurs 52 times in the ULB.
The list at the top of the page has only "profane, profaned, profaning."
("Godless" and "unholy" are only listed in a bullet as translation suggestions.)
I'm fine with leaving "profane" as is in the ULB and TW.
What do you think?
@JohnH @TomWarren @hmw3
I don't remember if we ever made a decision about "profane". Please see the window above. What do you all think?
In the following issues, we kept "profane." I'm fine with keeping it. Both issues are closed
#161
And here #146
Profane is difficult, but consistently rendered.
I am fine with it ...
I will close this out.
Tom