Relative Pronoun - bullets #27
Labels
No Milestone
No Assignees
2 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: WycliffeAssociates/en_gwt#27
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s(<nil>)"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
More Information about this topic
A relative pronoun often refers to a noun that the writer or speaker has already used. When this happens, it will have the same number and gender as the noun it describes. The case of the relative pronoun helps someone to know the function of the relative clause in the sentence.
See: Adjective; Noun
My comments and questions.
I don't think that the sentence about case is correct. How about changing it to this?
"The case of the relative pronoun helps someone to know its function in the clause that the pronoun introduces."
I don't think the first bullet is correct. The relative pronoun has an antecedent. The antecedent is usually a noun phrase that precedes the relative pronoun. For example, in Mat 1:16 the relative pronoun ἧς is feminine singular and refers to Mary, its antecedent. How about changing that bullet to this?
Here's a suggestion.
More Information about this topic
Relative pronouns have gender and number.
Relative pronouns have case.
Drew, I finished what I was trying to do in the window above. Could you take a look at it?
Also I wonder if it would be good to say anything about the other uses of relative pronouns. If we only say that they introduce adjective and noun clauses, will people have trouble figuruing out what is happening in places where the relative pronouns do not introduce some kind of (subordinate) clause?
https://biblehub.com/greek/3739.htm
I was wondering if the more information was really necessary
I think the information about number, gender, and case is not needed. That kind of info is not given for the other pronoun records.
Would you want anything like this so that people won't be confused when they see a relatvie pronoun but not adjective clause or noun clause?
How else can a relative pronoun be used?
I am ood with it, but should was be were in the first bullet?
Thanks for pointing out the confusing wording. It should be "were" if the individuals were already referred to. But they weren't. Only the group was referred to.
How would this be instead?
I forgot to mention, this -- the verse references won't be in the record. They were only there if you wanted to see what I was talking about. I got the info from https://biblehub.com/greek/3739.htm
Better
Done.