RPP
/
en_tm
8
0
Fork 0
Files Issues Pull Requests Releases Wiki Activity See in Reader

Update 'checking/authentic-assessment/01.md' 

Issue 131  Added Tabitha's suggestion to step 3.
Changed "the rubric of must have skills" to "the team's rubric
Reworded step 3  bullets
This commit is contained in:
Susan Quigley 2019-07-30 20:53:36 +00:00
parent e0b1ff540d
commit 6b64776725
1 changed files with 4 additions and 3 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

7
checking/authentic-assessment/01.md
View File

@ -7,9 +7,10 @@ During the first few days of a MAST workshop, translation teams are guided throu
* What is a good translation? * What is a good translation?
* List at least ten qualities. Even twenty if you want to stretch. * List at least ten qualities. Even twenty if you want to stretch.
* Work together as a team to make one list that includes all the items from each individual’s list. Combine qualities that are the same and develop one master list of at least 10 qualities that everyone agrees on. The chosen leader will guide this process. * Work together as a team to make one list that includes all the items from each individual’s list. Combine qualities that are the same and develop one master list of at least 10 qualities that everyone agrees on. The chosen leader will guide this process.
3. Facilitator should review the rubric of "must have skills," determine if anything is missing, and ask questions to lead the group toward discovering and adding those traits. Some sample questions are: 3. If everyone is new to this process, the team can refer to v-raft.com to review a sample rubric. Compare your rubric with the sample. Are elements missing from yours that need to be added? Are there extra elements you may not need to keep? After discussing these you are ready to move to step four.
* If missing an expression of checking key words: "When you look at the language of scripture, what are some of the things that give scripture a strong sense of accuracy?" Keep asking until they express the "important words" (in some form) and then ask "should those be checked?" If a leader who has participated in this process before is available, he will review the team's rubric, determine if anything is missing, and ask questions to lead the group toward discovering and adding those traits. Some sample questions are:
* If missing a trait on consistency in naming (ie—Jesus, Son of God, Jesus Christ, Christ Jesus), ask "what do you think about the different names of Jesus—are those important to be translated consistently with a good source text? * If no one says that key words need to be translated accurately, ask "When you look at the language of scripture, what are some of the things that give scripture a strong sense of accuracy?" Keep asking until they express the "important words" (in some form) and then ask "should those be checked?"
* If no one says that names need to be translated in a consistent way (ie—Jesus, Son of God, Jesus Christ, Christ Jesus), ask "what do you think about the different names of Jesus—are those important to be translated consistently with a good source text?"
4. Take the one group rubric and do the rest of the following steps as a team. 4. Take the one group rubric and do the rest of the following steps as a team.
5. Define each of those items (verbally, and then record them). Each definition should be clear enough that anyone from that language group could utilize the rubric and understand the traits of quality. 5. Define each of those items (verbally, and then record them). Each definition should be clear enough that anyone from that language group could utilize the rubric and understand the traits of quality.
6. Next, you are going to have a discussion of each of the traits on the list and ask: 6. Next, you are going to have a discussion of each of the traits on the list and ask: