diff --git a/en_tn_46-ROM.tsv b/en_tn_46-ROM.tsv
index 81ee32bdf2..0c3f1d4b10 100644
--- a/en_tn_46-ROM.tsv
+++ b/en_tn_46-ROM.tsv
@@ -406,7 +406,7 @@ ROM	2	26	mkhr	figs-possession	τὰ δικαιώματα τοῦ νόμου	1		P
 ROM	2	26	be71	figs-rquestion	οὐχ ἡ ἀκροβυστία αὐτοῦ εἰς περιτομὴν λογισθήσεται	1	will not his uncircumcision be considered as circumcision?	Paul is using a rhetorical question here to emphasize how important it is do what **the law** requires. If you would not use a rhetorical question for this purpose in your language, you could translate his words as a statement or an exclamation and communicate the emphasis in another way. Alternate translation: “certainly God will reckon him as circumcised” (See: [[rc://en/ta/man/translate/figs-rquestion]])
 ROM	2	26	rjb5	figs-activepassive	οὐχ ἡ ἀκροβυστία αὐτοῦ εἰς περιτομὴν λογισθήσεται	1		If your language does not use the passive form in this way, you could express the idea in active form or in another way that is natural in your language. If you must state who did the action, Paul implies that “God” did it. Alternate translation: “won’t his uncircumcision count as circumcision” or “God will consider him circumcised” (See: [[rc://en/ta/man/translate/figs-activepassive]])<br>
 ROM	2	27	m8gf	figs-parallelism		1		This verse communicates opposite things with similar phrases, to emphasize the how **circumcision** is only beneficial if it is accompanied by fulfilling **the law** (See [2:25](../02/25.md)). Use a natural way in your language to emphasize this contrast. (See: [[rc://en/ta/man/translate/figs-parallelism]])
-ROM	2	27	lqz2	figs-distinguish	καὶ κρινεῖ ἡ ἐκ φύσεως ἀκροβυστία, τὸν νόμον τελοῦσα	1	And will not the one who is naturally uncircumcised condemn you … the law?	Here, **who, by nature uncircumcised, fulfills the law** gives us further information about the person who **will condemn** the **transgressor of the law**. If this is not understood in your language, you can make the relationship between these phrases clearer. Alternate translation: “Even if a Gentile is physically uncircumcised, but performs what the law requires, that person will judge” (See: [[rc://en/ta/man/translate/figs-distinguish]])
+ROM	2	27	lqz2	figs-distinguish	καὶ κρινεῖ ἡ ἐκ φύσεως ἀκροβυστία, τὸν νόμον τελοῦσα	1	And will not the one who is naturally uncircumcised condemn you … the law?	Here, **who, by nature uncircumcised, fulfills the law** gives us further information about the person who **will condemn** the **transgressor of the law**. If this is not understood in your language, you can make the relationship between these phrases clearer. Alternate translation: “Even if a Gentile is physically uncircumcised, but performs what the law requires, he will judge” (See: [[rc://en/ta/man/translate/figs-distinguish]])
 ROM	2	27	h2lj	figs-abstractnouns	ἐκ φύσεως	1		If your language does not use an abstract noun for this idea, you could express the idea behind the abstract noun **nature** in another way (See [2:14](../02/14.md)). Alternate translation: “even though he is physically” (See: [[rc://en/ta/man/translate/figs-abstractnouns]])
 ROM	2	27	pree	figs-distinguish	σὲ τὸν διὰ γράμματος καὶ περιτομῆς παραβάτην νόμου	1		Here, **though having the letter and circumcision** gives us further information about the **transgressor of the law**. If this is not understood in your language, you can make the relationship between these phrases clearer. Alternate translation: “although you are circumcised and know God’s written law, since you transgress God’s law” (See: [[rc://en/ta/man/translate/figs-distinguish]])
 ROM	2	28	g2vh		ἐν τῷ φανερῷ	1	outwardly	This refers to Jewish rituals, such as circumcision, which people can see.