Edit 'tn_GAL.tsv' using 'tc-create-app'

tn_GAL.tsv

@@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ front:intro	i6u9				0	# Introduction to Galatians\n\n## Part 1: General Introduc
 2:16	xgjs		rc://*/ta/man/translate/grammar-collectivenouns	νόμου & νόμου & νόμου	-1	Here, **the law** is a singular noun that refers to a group of laws that God gave Israel by dictating them to Moses. If your language does not use singular nouns in that way, you could use a different expression. See how you translated the phrase **the law** in Romans 2:12. Alternate translation: “God’s laws” (See: [[rc://en/ta/man/translate/grammar-collectivenouns]])
 2:16	ncnt		rc://*/ta/man/translate/grammar-connect-exceptions	ἐὰν μὴ	1	If it would appear in your language that Paul was making a statement here and then contradicting it, you could reword this to avoid using an exception clause. Alternate translation: “but rather, only” (See: [[rc://*/ta/man/translate/grammar-connect-exceptions]])
 2:16	iivr		rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-abstractnouns	πίστεως	-1	If your language does not use an abstract noun for the idea of **faith**, you could express the same idea with a such as “believing” or “trusts”, as modeled by the UST, or you could express the meaning in some other way that is natural in your language. (See: [[rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-abstractnouns]])
-2:16	q4iw		rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-exclusive	ἡμεῖς & δικαιωθῶμεν	1	When Paul says **we** it could be: (1) inclusive if Paul is still addressing Peter. If you decide that this verse is a continuation of the quotation that began in [2:14](../02/14.md) then **we** is inclusive both times that it occurs in this verse because Paul is still addressing Peter and would be including Peter and the Jewish Christians in Antioch. Your language may require you to mark these forms. (2) exclusive if you decide that Paul’s quotation of his words to Peter ended at the end [2:14](../02/14.md). (See: [[rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-exclusive]])
+2:16	q4iw		rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-exclusive	ἡμεῖς & δικαιωθῶμεν	1	When Paul says **we** it could be: (1) inclusive if Paul is still addressing Peter. If you decide that this verse is a continuation of the quotation that began in [2:14](../02/14.md), then **we** is inclusive both times that it occurs in this verse, because Paul is still addressing Peter and would be including Peter and the Jewish Christians in Antioch. Your language may require you to mark these forms. (2) exclusive if you decide that Paul’s quotation of his words to Peter ended at the end [2:14](../02/14.md). (See: [[rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-exclusive]])
 2:16	nzcb		rc://*/ta/man/translate/grammar-connect-logic-goal	ἵνα	1	The phrase **so that** introduces a purpose clause. Paul is introducing the purpose for which he and the other Jewish believers **believed in Christ Jesus**, which is **so that** they **might be justified by faith in Christ**. Use a natural way in your language for introducing a purpose clause. Alternate translation: “in order that” (See: [[rc://*/ta/man/translate/grammar-connect-logic-goal]])
 2:16	gp4w		rc://*/ta/man/translate/grammar-connect-logic-result	ὅτι ἐξ ἔργων νόμου, οὐ δικαιωθήσεται πᾶσα σάρξ	1	Here, the word **For** re-introduces and re-states the reason why Cephas and the other Jewish believers **believed in Christ Jesus**. They **believed in Jesus Christ** for the reason that **by works of the law no flesh will be justified**. The phrase **by works of the law no flesh will be justified** is saying the exact same thing, in slightly different words, as the phrase which occurs earlier in the verse which says **no man is justified by works of the law**. If it would not be natural in your language to re-introduce the reason after the result you could re-introduce and re-state the result. Alternate translation: “We believed in Christ Jesus because no flesh will be justified by works of the law” (See: [[rc://*/ta/man/translate/grammar-connect-logic-result]])
 2:16	j7g5		rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-synecdoche	πᾶσα σάρξ	1	The word **flesh** refers to human beings. Paul uses a part of the human body to refer to the entire human. The phrase “any flesh” means “any person.” If your readers would misunderstand this, you could use an equivalent expression from your culture or plain language. Alternate translation: “no person” (See: [[rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-synecdoche]])