diff --git a/en_tn_46-ROM.tsv b/en_tn_46-ROM.tsv
index b3a5608bad..4648777720 100644
--- a/en_tn_46-ROM.tsv
+++ b/en_tn_46-ROM.tsv
@@ -404,7 +404,7 @@ ROM	2	26	nf3j	figs-idiom	φυλάσσῃ	1	keeps the requirements of the law	Her
 ROM	2	26	mkhr	figs-possession	τὰ δικαιώματα τοῦ νόμου	1		Paul is using the possessive form to describe **requirements** found in **the law**. If this is not clear in your language, you could use the adjective “law’s” instead of the noun “law.” Alternate translation: “what the law requires” or “the law’s requirements” (See: [[rc://en/ta/man/translate/figs-possession]])
 ROM	2	26	be71	figs-rquestion	οὐχ ἡ ἀκροβυστία αὐτοῦ εἰς περιτομὴν λογισθήσεται	1	will not his uncircumcision be considered as circumcision?	Paul is using a rhetorical question here to emphasize how important it is do what **the law** requires. If you would not use a rhetorical question for this purpose in your language, you could translate his words as a statement or an exclamation and communicate the emphasis in another way. Alternate translation: “certainly God will reckon him as circumcised” (See: [[rc://en/ta/man/translate/figs-rquestion]])
 ROM	2	26	rjb5	figs-activepassive	οὐχ ἡ ἀκροβυστία αὐτοῦ εἰς περιτομὴν λογισθήσεται	1		If your language does not use the passive form in this way, you could express the idea in active form or in another way that is natural in your language. If you must state who did the action, Paul implies that “God” did it. Alternate translation: “won’t his uncircumcision count as circumcision” or “God will consider him circumcised” (See: [[rc://en/ta/man/translate/figs-activepassive]])<br>
-ROM	2	27	lqz2	figs-distinguish	καὶ κρινεῖ ἡ ἐκ φύσεως ἀκροβυστία, τὸν νόμον τελοῦσα	1	And will not the one who is naturally uncircumcised condemn you … the law?	Here, **who, by nature uncircumcised, fulfills the law** gives us further information about the person who **will condemn** the Jews who do not fulfill **the law**. If this is not understood in your language, you can make the relationship between these phrases more clear. Alternate translation: “even the physically uncircumcised Gentile who does what the law requires, will judge” (See: [[rc://en/ta/man/translate/figs-distinguish]])
+ROM	2	27	lqz2	figs-distinguish	καὶ κρινεῖ ἡ ἐκ φύσεως ἀκροβυστία, τὸν νόμον τελοῦσα	1	And will not the one who is naturally uncircumcised condemn you … the law?	Here, **who, by nature uncircumcised, fulfills the law** gives us further information about the person who **will condemn** the **transgressor of the law**. If this is not understood in your language, you can make the relationship between these phrases more clear. Alternate translation: “Even if a Gentile is physically uncircumcised, but does what the law requires, he will judge” (See: [[rc://en/ta/man/translate/figs-distinguish]])
 ROM	2	28	g2vh		ἐν τῷ φανερῷ	1	outwardly	This refers to Jewish rituals, such as circumcision, which people can see.
 ROM	2	28	bl6h		ἐν τῷ φανερῷ ἐν σαρκὶ	1	merely outward in the flesh	This refers to the physical change to a man’s body when someone circumcises him.
 ROM	2	28	s44m	figs-synecdoche	σαρκὶ	1	flesh	Here, **the flesh** is a synecdoche for the whole body. Alternate translation: “the body” (See: [[rc://en/ta/man/translate/figs-synecdoche]])