Edit 'en_tn_47-1CO.tsv' using 'tc-create-app'

en_tn_47-1CO.tsv

@@ -2123,14 +2123,12 @@ Book	Chapter	Verse	ID	SupportReference	OrigQuote	Occurrence	GLQuote	OccurrenceNo
 1CO	15	12	ub2p	figs-rquestion	πῶς λέγουσιν ἐν ὑμῖν τινες, ὅτι ἀνάστασις νεκρῶν οὐκ ἔστιν?	1	how can some of you say there is no resurrection of the dead?	Paul does not ask this question because he is looking for information. Rather, he asks it to involve the Corinthians in what he is arguing. The implied answer to the question is “that cannot be true.” If your readers would misunderstand this question, you could express the idea by using a word or phrase that indicates that Paul is shocked that they are saying this or that it is contradictory to say this. Alternate translation, as a statement: “I am amazed that some among you say that there is no resurrection of the dead.” or “it does not make sense for some among you to say that there is no resurrection of the dead.” (See: [[rc://en/ta/man/translate/figs-rquestion]])
 1CO	15	12	izkz	figs-abstractnouns	ἀνάστασις νεκρῶν οὐκ ἔστιν	1	how can some of you say there is no resurrection of the dead?	If your language does not use an abstract noun for the idea behind **resurrection**, you could express the idea by using a verb such as “resurrect” or “live again.” Alternate translation: “the dead will not resurrect” or “the dead will not be restored to life” (See: [[rc://en/ta/man/translate/figs-abstractnouns]])
 1CO	15	13	eqxa		εἰ…ἀνάστασις νεκρῶν οὐκ ἔστιν	1	if there is no resurrection of the dead, then not even Christ has been raised	Here, **there is no resurrection of the dead** repeats the words found at the end of the last verse ([15:12](../15/12.md)). Paul repeats these words to make what he is arguing very clear. If your readers do not need these words to be repeated, and if they would be confused about why Paul is repeating himself, you could refer back to the words in the previous verse with a short phrase. Alternate translation: “if that were true”
-1CO	15	13	cn2m	figs-hypo	εἰ…ἀνάστασις νεκρῶν οὐκ ἔστιν, οὐδὲ Χριστὸς ἐγήγερται	1	if there is no resurrection of the dead, then not even Christ has been raised	Here Paul is using a hypothetical situation to teach the Corinthians. He wants them to imagine that **there is no resurrection of the dead**. In this situation, **not even Christ has been raised**. Since this conclusion contradicts what he has already claimed to be true in the last verse ([15:12](../15/12.md)), the imagined claim must also be false. Use a natural way in your language to introduce a hypothetical situation. Alternate translation: “imagine that there is no resurrection of the dead. In this situation, not even Christ has been raised” (See: [[rc://en/ta/man/translate/figs-hypo]])
-1CO	15	13	zwcu	grammar-connect-condition-contrary	εἰ…ἀνάστασις νεκρῶν οὐκ ἔστιν	1	if there is no resurrection of the dead, then not even Christ has been raised	Here Paul is making a conditional statement that sounds hypothetical, but he is already convinced that the condition is not true. He knows that there really is a **resurrection of the dead**. However, he uses this form to show the Corinthians the implications of their claim that “there is no resurrection of the dead” (see [15:12](../15/12.md)). Use a natural form in your language for introducing a condition that the speaker believes is not true. Alternate translation: “if there actually were no resurrection of the dead” (See: [[rc://en/ta/man/translate/grammar-connect-condition-contrary]])
+1CO	15	13	zwcu	grammar-connect-condition-contrary	εἰ…ἀνάστασις νεκρῶν οὐκ ἔστιν	1	if there is no resurrection of the dead, then not even Christ has been raised	Here Paul is making a conditional statement that sounds hypothetical, but he is already convinced that the condition is not true. He knows that there really is a **resurrection of the dead**. He uses this form to show the Corinthians the implications of their claim that “there is no resurrection of the dead” (see [15:12](../15/12.md)). Use a natural form in your language for introducing a condition that the speaker believes is not true. Alternate translation: “if there actually were no resurrection of the dead” (See: [[rc://en/ta/man/translate/grammar-connect-condition-contrary]])
 1CO	15	13	eq2c	figs-abstractnouns	ἀνάστασις νεκρῶν οὐκ ἔστιν	1	if there is no resurrection of the dead, then not even Christ has been raised	If your language does not use an abstract noun for the idea behind **resurrection**, you could express the idea by using a verb such as “resurrect” or “live again.” Alternate translation: “the dead will not resurrect” or “the dead will not be restored to life” (See: [[rc://en/ta/man/translate/figs-abstractnouns]])
 1CO	15	13	vbhj	figs-nominaladj	νεκρῶν	1	if there is no resurrection of the dead, then not even Christ has been raised	Paul is using the adjective **dead** as a noun in order to refer to all people who are **dead**. Your language may use adjectives in the same way. If not, you could translate this with a noun phrase. Alternate translation: “of the dead people” or “of the corpses” (See: [[rc://en/ta/man/translate/figs-nominaladj]])
 1CO	15	13	mi12	figs-activepassive	οὐδὲ Χριστὸς ἐγήγερται	1	not even Christ has been raised	If your language does not use the passive form in this way, you could express the idea in active form or in another way that is natural in your language. Paul uses the passive here to focus on Jesus, who was **raised**, rather than focusing on the one doing the “raising.” If you must state who did the action, Paul implies that “God” did it. Alternate translation: “God has not raised even Christ” (See: [[rc://en/ta/man/translate/figs-activepassive]])
-1CO	15	14	izp7	figs-doublet	εἰ…Χριστὸς οὐκ ἐγήγερται	1	not even Christ has been raised	Here, **Christ has not been raised** repeats words found at the end of the last verse ([15:13](../15/13.md)). Paul repeats these words to make what he is arguing very clear. If your readers do not need these words to be repeated, and if they would be confused about why Paul is repeating himself, you could refer back to the words in the previous verse with a short phrase. Alternate translation: “if that were true” (See: [[rc://en/ta/man/translate/figs-doublet]])
-1CO	15	14	ntmt	figs-hypo	εἰ…Χριστὸς οὐκ ἐγήγερται, κενὸν ἄρα τὸ κήρυγμα ἡμῶν, κενὴ καὶ ἡ πίστις ὑμῶν	1	not even Christ has been raised	Here Paul is using a hypothetical situation to teach the Corinthians. He wants them to imagine that **Christ has not been raised**. In this situation, **our preaching** and **your faith** are both **in vain**. If they think that their **faith** and the apostles’ **preaching** are not **in vain**, then the imagined claim must be false. Use a natural way in your language to introduce a hypothetical situation. Alternate translation: “imagine that Christ has not been raised. In this situation, our preaching {is} in vain, and your faith {is} in vain” (See: [[rc://en/ta/man/translate/figs-hypo]])
-1CO	15	14	zokz	grammar-connect-condition-contrary	εἰ…Χριστὸς οὐκ ἐγήγερται	1	not even Christ has been raised	Here Paul is making a conditional statement that sounds hypothetical, but he is already convinced that the condition is not true. He knows that **Christ** really has **been raised**. Use a natural form in your language for introducing a condition that the speaker believes is not true. Alternate translation: “if Christ has not actually been raised” (See: [[rc://en/ta/man/translate/grammar-connect-condition-contrary]])
+1CO	15	14	izp7		εἰ…Χριστὸς οὐκ ἐγήγερται	1	not even Christ has been raised	Here, **Christ has not been raised** repeats words found at the end of the last verse ([15:13](../15/13.md)). Paul repeats these words to make what he is arguing very clear. If your readers do not need these words to be repeated, and if they would be confused about why Paul is repeating himself, you could refer back to the words in the previous verse with a short phrase. Alternate translation: “if that were true”
+1CO	15	14	zokz	grammar-connect-condition-contrary	εἰ…Χριστὸς οὐκ ἐγήγερται	1	not even Christ has been raised	Here Paul is making a conditional statement that sounds hypothetical, but he is already convinced that the condition is not true. He knows that **Christ** really has **been raised**. He uses this form to continue to show the Corinthians the implications of their claim about resurrection. Use a natural form in your language for introducing a condition that the speaker believes is not true. Alternate translation: “if Christ has not actually been raised” (See: [[rc://en/ta/man/translate/grammar-connect-condition-contrary]])
 1CO	15	14	lsos	figs-activepassive	Χριστὸς οὐκ ἐγήγερται	1	not even Christ has been raised	If your language does not use the passive form in this way, you could express the idea in active form or in another way that is natural in your language. Paul uses the passive here to focus on Jesus, who was **raised**, rather than focusing on the one doing the “raising.” If you must state who did the action, Paul implies that “God” did it. Alternate translation: “God has not raised Christ” (See: [[rc://en/ta/man/translate/figs-activepassive]])
 1CO	15	14	xth0	figs-parallelism	κενὸν…τὸ κήρυγμα ἡμῶν, κενὴ καὶ ἡ πίστις ὑμῶν	1	not even Christ has been raised	Here Paul repeats **in vain** and the same structure in two straight clauses. This was worded powerfully in his culture. If your readers would misunderstand why Paul repeats words and structure, and if it would not be worded powerfully in your culture, you could eliminate some or all of the repetition and make the statements powerful in another way. Alternate translation: “our preaching and your faith are all in vain” (See: [[rc://en/ta/man/translate/figs-parallelism]])
 1CO	15	14	qre2	figs-exclusive	ἡμῶν	1	not even Christ has been raised	Here, **our** refers to Paul and the other apostles mentioned in earlier verses (see [15:11](../15/11.md)). It does not include the Corinthians. (See: [[rc://en/ta/man/translate/figs-exclusive]])