Edit 'en_tn_47-1CO.tsv' using 'tc-create-app'

en_tn_47-1CO.tsv

@@ -1748,7 +1748,7 @@ Book	Chapter	Verse	ID	SupportReference	OrigQuote	Occurrence	GLQuote	OccurrenceNo
 1CO	12	28	w726	translate-unknown	γένη γλωσσῶν	1	those who have various kinds of tongues	Here, **various kinds of tongues** has the same meaning it had in [12:10](../12/10.md). Translate it the same way you did there. (See: [[rc://en/ta/man/translate/translate-unknown]])
 1CO	12	28	ovh9	figs-metonymy	γλωσσῶν	1	those who have various kinds of tongues	Here, **tongues** refers to something that one does with one’s “tongue,” which is to speak a language. If your readers would misunderstand that **tongues** is a way of speaking about “languages,” you could use a comparable term or express the idea nonfiguratively. Alternate translation: “of languages” (See: [[rc://en/ta/man/translate/figs-metonymy]])
 1CO	12	29	aq64	figs-rquestion	μὴ πάντες ἀπόστολοι? μὴ πάντες προφῆται? μὴ πάντες διδάσκαλοι? μὴ πάντες δυνάμεις?	1	Are all of them apostles? Are all prophets? Are all teachers? Do all do powerful deeds?	Paul does not ask these questions because he is looking for information. Rather, he asks them to involve the Corinthians in what he is arguing. The questions assume that the answer is “no, they are not” or “no, they do not.” If your readers would misunderstand these questions, you could express the ideas as strong negations. Alternate translation: “Not all {are} apostles. Not all {are} prophets. Not all {are} teachers. Not all {do} miracles.” (See: [[rc://en/ta/man/translate/figs-rquestion]])
-1CO	12	29	gryp	figs-ellipsis	μὴ πάντες δυνάμεις	1	Are all of them apostles? Are all prophets? Are all teachers? Do all do powerful deeds?	Here, unlike with the other questions in the verse, supplying **are** does not make sense. Paul is not saying that **Not all** “are” **miracles**. Rather, he is saying that **Not all** perform **miracles**. You could supply a comparable word that refers to “performing” **miracles**. Alternate translation: “Not all {perform} miracles, {do they}” (See: [[rc://en/ta/man/translate/figs-ellipsis]])
+1CO	12	29	gryp	figs-ellipsis	μὴ πάντες δυνάμεις	1	Are all of them apostles? Are all prophets? Are all teachers? Do all do powerful deeds?	Here, unlike with the other questions in the verse, supplying **are** does not make sense. Paul is not saying that **Not all** “are” **miracles**. Rather, he is saying that **Not all** perform **miracles**. You could supply a comparable word that refers to “performing” **miracles**. Alternate translation: “Not all {perform} miracles, do they” (See: [[rc://en/ta/man/translate/figs-ellipsis]])
 1CO	12	30	p919	figs-rquestion	μὴ πάντες χαρίσματα ἔχουσιν ἰαμάτων? μὴ πάντες γλώσσαις λαλοῦσιν? μὴ πάντες διερμηνεύουσιν?	1	Do all of them have gifts of healing?	Paul does not ask these questions because he is looking for information. Rather, he asks them to involve the Corinthians in what he is arguing. The questions assume that the answer is “no, they do not.” If your readers would misunderstand these questions, you could express the ideas as strong negations. Alternate translation: “Not all have gifts of healing. Not all speak in tongues. Not all interpret.” (See: [[rc://en/ta/man/translate/figs-rquestion]])
 1CO	12	30	x1ha	figs-metonymy	γλώσσαις	1	Do all of them have gifts of healing?	Here, **tongues** refers to something that one does with one’s “tongue,” which is to speak a language. If your readers would misunderstand that **tongues** is a way of speaking about “languages,” you could use a comparable term or express the idea nonfiguratively. Alternate translation: “in other languages” (See: [[rc://en/ta/man/translate/figs-metonymy]])
 1CO	12	30	ab9e	figs-explicit	διερμηνεύουσιν	1	interpret	Here Paul is speaking about the same “gift” that he mentioned in [12:10](../12/10.md) as “the interpretation of tongues.” He does not mention what the person “interprets” here because he knows that the Corinthians will infer that he is speaking about the **tongues** in the previous question. If your readers would not infer what the person “interprets,” you could state it explicitly. Alternate translation: “interpret tongues, do they” (See: [[rc://en/ta/man/translate/figs-explicit]])