DCS-Mirror
/
RobH_en_tn
mirror of https://git.door43.org/RobH/en_tn
2
0
Fork 0
Files Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity See in Reader

Edit 'en_tn_46-ROM.tsv' using 'tc-create-app'

This commit is contained in:
Vessoul1973 2022-04-27 16:23:40 +00:00
parent ce32567cca
commit ee4fcde287
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
en_tn_46-ROM.tsv
View File

@ -404,7 +404,7 @@ ROM 2 26 nf3j figs-idiom φυλάσσῃ 1 keeps the requirements of the law Her
ROM 2 26 mkhr figs-possession τὰ δικαιώματα τοῦ νόμου 1 Paul is using the possessive form to describe **requirements** found in **the law**. If this is not clear in your language, you could use the adjective “law’s” instead of the noun “law.” Alternate translation: “what the law requires” or “the law’s requirements” (See: [[rc://en/ta/man/translate/figs-possession]])
ROM 2 26 be71 figs-rquestion οὐχ ἡ ἀκροβυστία αὐτοῦ εἰς περιτομὴν λογισθήσεται 1 will not his uncircumcision be considered as circumcision? Paul is using a rhetorical question here to emphasize how important it is do what **the law** requires. If you would not use a rhetorical question for this purpose in your language, you could translate his words as a statement or an exclamation and communicate the emphasis in another way. Alternate translation: “certainly God will reckon him as circumcised” (See: [[rc://en/ta/man/translate/figs-rquestion]])
ROM 2 26 rjb5 figs-activepassive οὐχ ἡ ἀκροβυστία αὐτοῦ εἰς περιτομὴν λογισθήσεται 1 If your language does not use the passive form in this way, you could express the idea in active form or in another way that is natural in your language. If you must state who did the action, Paul implies that “God” did it. Alternate translation: “won’t his uncircumcision count as circumcision” or “God will consider him circumcised” (See: [[rc://en/ta/man/translate/figs-activepassive]])<br>
ROM 2 27 lqz2 1 And will not the one who is naturally uncircumcised condemn you … the law?
ROM 2 27 lqz2 figs-distinguish καὶ κρινεῖ ἡ ἐκ φύσεως ἀκροβυστία, τὸν νόμον τελοῦσα 1 And will not the one who is naturally uncircumcised condemn you … the law? Here, **who, by nature uncircumcised, fulfills the law** gives us further information about the person who **will condemn** the Jews who do not fulfill **the law**. If this is not understood in your language, you can make the relationship between these phrases more clear. Alternate translation: “even the physically uncircumcised Gentile who does what the law requires, will judge” (See: [[rc://en/ta/man/translate/figs-distinguish]])
ROM 2 28 g2vh ἐν τῷ φανερῷ 1 outwardly This refers to Jewish rituals, such as circumcision, which people can see.
ROM 2 28 bl6h ἐν τῷ φανερῷ ἐν σαρκὶ 1 merely outward in the flesh This refers to the physical change to a man’s body when someone circumcises him.
ROM 2 28 s44m figs-synecdoche σαρκὶ 1 flesh Here, **the flesh** is a synecdoche for the whole body. Alternate translation: “the body” (See: [[rc://en/ta/man/translate/figs-synecdoche]])

1 Book Chapter Verse ID SupportReference OrigQuote Occurrence GLQuote OccurrenceNote
404 ROM 2 26 mkhr figs-possession τὰ δικαιώματα τοῦ νόμου 1 Paul is using the possessive form to describe **requirements** found in **the law**. If this is not clear in your language, you could use the adjective “law’s” instead of the noun “law.” Alternate translation: “what the law requires” or “the law’s requirements” (See: [[rc://en/ta/man/translate/figs-possession]])
405 ROM 2 26 be71 figs-rquestion οὐχ ἡ ἀκροβυστία αὐτοῦ εἰς περιτομὴν λογισθήσεται 1 will not his uncircumcision be considered as circumcision? Paul is using a rhetorical question here to emphasize how important it is do what **the law** requires. If you would not use a rhetorical question for this purpose in your language, you could translate his words as a statement or an exclamation and communicate the emphasis in another way. Alternate translation: “certainly God will reckon him as circumcised” (See: [[rc://en/ta/man/translate/figs-rquestion]])
406 ROM 2 26 rjb5 figs-activepassive οὐχ ἡ ἀκροβυστία αὐτοῦ εἰς περιτομὴν λογισθήσεται 1 If your language does not use the passive form in this way, you could express the idea in active form or in another way that is natural in your language. If you must state who did the action, Paul implies that “God” did it. Alternate translation: “won’t his uncircumcision count as circumcision” or “God will consider him circumcised” (See: [[rc://en/ta/man/translate/figs-activepassive]])<br>
407 ROM 2 27 lqz2 figs-distinguish καὶ κρινεῖ ἡ ἐκ φύσεως ἀκροβυστία, τὸν νόμον τελοῦσα 1 And will not the one who is naturally uncircumcised condemn you … the law? Here, **who, by nature uncircumcised, fulfills the law** gives us further information about the person who **will condemn** the Jews who do not fulfill **the law**. If this is not understood in your language, you can make the relationship between these phrases more clear. Alternate translation: “even the physically uncircumcised Gentile who does what the law requires, will judge” (See: [[rc://en/ta/man/translate/figs-distinguish]])
408 ROM 2 28 g2vh ἐν τῷ φανερῷ 1 outwardly This refers to Jewish rituals, such as circumcision, which people can see.
409 ROM 2 28 bl6h ἐν τῷ φανερῷ ἐν σαρκὶ 1 merely outward in the flesh This refers to the physical change to a man’s body when someone circumcises him.
410 ROM 2 28 s44m figs-synecdoche σαρκὶ 1 flesh Here, **the flesh** is a synecdoche for the whole body. Alternate translation: “the body” (See: [[rc://en/ta/man/translate/figs-synecdoche]])