Edit 'en_tn_47-1CO.tsv' using 'tc-create-app'

en_tn_47-1CO.tsv

@@ -2388,7 +2388,7 @@ Book	Chapter	Verse	ID	SupportReference	OrigQuote	Occurrence	GLQuote	OccurrenceNo
 1CO	15	54	j9zs	figs-metaphor	ἐνδύσηται ἀφθαρσίαν…ἐνδύσηται ἀθανασίαν	1	this mortal body has put on immortality	Here Paul speaks as if the **perishable** and the **mortal** could **put on incorruptibility** and **immortality** like they were pieces of clothing. He does not mean that believers still have what is **perishable** and **mortal** somehow underneath **incorruptibility** and **immortality**. Instead, Paul uses the metaphor to illustrate how people will change identity from what is **perishable** and **mortal** to **incorruptibility** and **immortality**. If your readers would misunderstand this figure of speech, you could use a comparable metaphor or express the idea nonfiguratively. Alternate translation: “has changed into incorruptibility … has changed into immortality” or “has become incorruptible … has become immortal” (See: [[rc://en/ta/man/translate/figs-metaphor]])
 1CO	15	54	yjhy	figs-abstractnouns	ἀφθαρσίαν…ἀθανασίαν	1	this mortal body has put on immortality	If your language does not use abstract nouns for the ideas behind **incorruptibility** and **immortality**, you could express the idea by using adjectives such as “incorruptible” and “immortal.” Alternate translation: “what is incorruptible … what is immortal” (See: [[rc://en/ta/man/translate/figs-abstractnouns]])
 1CO	15	54	m0l5	translate-unknown	τὸ θνητὸν τοῦτο…ἀθανασίαν	1	this mortal body has put on immortality	Here, **mortal** and **immortality** identify whether people or things die or cannot die. If your readers would misunderstand **mortal** and **immortality**, you could use two words or phrases that refer to whether things can die or not. See how you translated these words in [15:53](../15/53.md). Alternate translation: “what can die … what never dies” (See: [[rc://en/ta/man/translate/translate-unknown]])
-1CO	15	54	idtf	figs-idiom	γενήσεται	1	this mortal body has put on immortality	Here, **will come about** identifies that something will happen or come to pass. If your readers would misunderstand **will come about**, you could use a comparable idiom or express the idea nonfiguratively. Alternate translation: “will come to pass” or “will be realized”
+1CO	15	54	idtf	figs-idiom	γενήσεται	1	this mortal body has put on immortality	Here, **will come about** identifies that something will happen or come to pass. If your readers would misunderstand **will come about**, you could use a comparable idiom or express the idea nonfiguratively. Alternate translation: “will come to pass” or “will be realized” (See: [[rc://en/ta/man/translate/figs-idiom]])
 1CO	15	54	ozha	figs-metonymy	ὁ λόγος	1	this mortal body has put on immortality	Here, **word** figuratively represents what someone says or writes in words. If your readers would misunderstand **word**, you could use an equivalent expression or plain language. Alternate translation: “the message” (See: [[rc://en/ta/man/translate/figs-metonymy]])
 1CO	15	54	asfj	writing-quotations	ὁ λόγος ὁ γεγραμμένος	1	this mortal body has put on immortality	In Paul’s culture, **the word that is written** is a normal way to introduce a quotation from or reference to an important text, in this case, the Old Testament book titled “Isaiah” (see ([Isaiah 25:8](../../isa/25/08.md))). Most likely, this phrase introduces the quote from [Hosea 13:14](../../hos/13/14.md) in the next verse as well. If your readers would misunderstand **the word that is written**, you could use a comparable phrase that indicates that Paul is quoting from or referring to an important text. Alternate translation: “what can be read in the Scriptures” or “the words that Isaiah and Hosea wrote” (See: [[rc://en/ta/man/translate/writing-quotations]])
 1CO	15	54	r5he	figs-activepassive	ὁ γεγραμμένος	1	this mortal body has put on immortality	If your language does not use the passive form in this way, you could express the idea in active form or in another way that is natural in your language. Paul uses the passive form here to focus on what **is written** rather than focusing on the person doing the “writing.” If you must state who does the action, you could express it so that: (1) the scripture author writes or speaks the words. Alternate translation: “the prophets have written” (2) God speaks the words. Alternate translation: “God has said” (See: [[rc://en/ta/man/translate/figs-activepassive]])